In the case of conflicting Contract Documents, which order of priority is correct from highest to lowest?

In construction contracts, the order of priority among conflicting contract documents is crucial for determining which document takes precedence in the event of discrepancies. The correct choice highlights the hierarchical structure typically found in contractual agreements.

The agreement itself represents the foundational contract between the parties and captures the essential descriptions of the project, the identities of contracting parties, and key dates. Following that, definitions provide clarity on terms used throughout the documents, ensuring that all parties have a mutual understanding of terminology. Supplemental conditions usually modify general conditions to address specific project constraints or particularities and are often tailored to the contract in question.

General conditions outline standard practices and responsivities applicable to many contracts and serve as the groundwork for how the project will be managed. Specifications provide detailed descriptions of the materials, workmanship, and installation methods required for the project, serving as a guide for the contractor.

Prioritizing these documents from the highest to lowest ensures that the most critical agreements are served first, followed by terms that clarify their application and implications in the context of the specific project. This order helps mitigate potential conflicts and misunderstandings during the execution of the construction contract, guiding professionals in resolving issues that may arise due to misinterpretation of the contract documents.